Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02378
Original file (BC 2014 02378.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 			DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02378

						COUNSEL:  NONE

						HEARING DESIRED:  NO 



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded 
to honorable.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was young and made a dumb decision that cost him his 
honorable military service record.  During a night of drinking, 
he acted upon a problem.  He was evaluated by a psychiatrist and 
advised that it was in his best interest to accept the 
discharge.  He made some mistakes; however, this incident was 
the only time that he acted out.  He has had a clean record 
since his discharge and no longer drinks.  He no longer has the 
problems that he once dealt with.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 
27 Aug 56. 

On 12 Apr 62, the applicant was furnished a general (under 
honorable conditions) discharge, and was credited with 5 years, 
7 months, and 16 days of active service.  A copy of the 
applicant's discharge package is not available; therefore, the 
exact circumstances that precipitated the discharge could not be 
verified.  .

On 21 Jun 14, a request for post-service information was 
forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 
30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this 
office (Exhibit C).




THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or 
injustice that occurred in the discharge processing.  We note 
that a copy of the applicant’s discharge package is unavailable 
for our review; however, the presumption of regularity in the 
conduct of government affairs dictates that, absent evidence to 
the contrary, it should be assumed that the discharge was 
carried out in accordance with the governing directive in effect 
at the time of the discharge.  The applicant has provided no 
evidence which would lead us to believe the characterization of 
the service was contrary to the provisions of the governing 
regulation, unduly harsh, or disproportionate to the offenses 
committed.  In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading 
the discharge based on clemency; however, in the absence of any 
evidence related to the applicant’s post-service activities, 
there is no way for us to determine if the applicant’s 
accomplishments since leaving the service are sufficiently 
meritorious to overcome the misconduct for which he was 
discharged.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the 
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought. 


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-02378 in Executive Session on 25 Mar 15, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	



The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-02378 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 5 Jun 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, AFBCMR, dated 21 Jun 14, w/atchs.
	

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02118

    Original file (BC 2014 02118.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02118 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, in the absence of any evidence related to the applicant’s post-service activities, there is no way for us to determine if the applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02061

    Original file (BC 2014 02061.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 27 Oct 87, the case was found legally sufficient and, on 4 Nov 87, the discharge authority directed the applicant be discharged. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority. Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 4 Aug 14, w/atchs.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04306

    Original file (BC-2011-04306.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04306 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect: a. He also acknowledged that if his request for discharge was approved he could receive an undesirable discharge under other than honorable conditions. On 29 Mar 76, the applicant was furnished an under other...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04099

    Original file (BC 2013 04099.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04099 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to a Honorable Discharge. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. On 3 Jun 86, the applicant was notified by his commander of an amendment to the 24 Apr 86 Letter of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00503

    Original file (BC 2014 00503.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 Nov 09, the applicant received a Letter of Reprimand. The commander recommended characterizing the discharge as General (Under Honorable Conditions). AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03190

    Original file (BC 2014 03190.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03190 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was an excellent Airman and all Enlisted Performance Reports and Feedback Worksheets reflect that fact. The discharge authority approved the administrative discharge with a service characterization of General...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02378

    Original file (BC 2013 02378.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02378 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected to reflect she was authorized and awarded the Armed Forces Service Medal (AFSM). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00135

    Original file (BC 2014 00135.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s discharge package is not available for review; therefore, the circumstances precipitating the applicant’s discharge could not be verified. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, in the absence of any evidence related to the applicant’s post-service activities, there is no way for us to determine if the applicant’s accomplishments since leaving the service warrant such an action. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02222

    Original file (BC-2011-02222.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who entered active duty on 1 June 1982 and was promoted to the grade of airman (E-2) with a date of rank of 1 December 1982. The applicant responded by stating he had developed an alcohol drinking problem while in the service, but didn’t realize it at the time. ________________________________________________________________ The following members...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00185

    Original file (BC-2012-00185.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00185 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show his character of service as honorable instead of general (under honorable conditions). Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we conclude that no basis exists to upgrade the applicant’s general...